and when i start to come undone, stitch me together

i meant to post this earlier but i never got around to it. as you know, the report on the intel on iraq came out, and pretty much blasted the cia. of course what the media wants you to think is that the report is damning to the bush administration, when in reality that is rediculous. people like to forget that bush does not get out there and uncover the intelligence himself. he has no choice but to rely on the information given to him.

that said, the new york post had a great editorial on why going to war in iraq was still the right thing to do. let's face it, saddam clearly harbored terrorists such as this al-zarqawi guy. it shouldn't be crucial as to whether or not he had links to al qaeda, the point is that he still aided terrorists and terrorist groups that are hostile to the united states. in the same way, removing saddam was the right thing to do whether or not he had stores of weapons of mass destruction. remember, this is the war on terrorism, not the war on al qaeda or the war on weapons of mass destruction. which means we fight terrorism at every front, in every form.

wow, so apparently the democrats consider america incapable of conducting our own elections. a group has petitioned kofi annan at the united nations to send an international group to oversee the election process in florida. the whole idea is absoutely absurb, why in the world would we petition for an international group to oversee our own private national elections?! did they even bother to think that chances are a good number of these overseers won't even be from democratic nations? what do they know of democracy? i'm glad they think the united states is too incompetant to handle this.

and finally, here's a good article outlining many of the things the media won't tell you about their darling john edwards. what a fraud.